Perth-WRX.com  

Go Back   Perth-WRX.com > Technical > Mechanicals
Register Diddy Kart ArticlesAll AlbumsBlogs FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Welcome to Perth-WRX, click here to register!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 19-07-2007, 04:22 PM
vyper's Avatar
Subaru Tech Division
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SOR
Posts: 1,473
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
vyper at standard level
Default

Assuming a target of 260kW with a bosch 910 pump on a 2.5. Stockies will do the job? Seems like its pushing the stock injectors a touch too far.
__________________
TD06 - Oink.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 19-07-2007, 04:26 PM
Mister Two's Avatar
Perth WRX Old Skool Cool Dude
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Surface of the Sun
Posts: 4,042
Thanks: 5
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Mister Two at standard level
Default

According to his profile... Hes got a 99 WRX right? Which means. You cannot de-cap the injectors. 99 WRX has side feed injectors. And while they can be high flowed, they cannot be decapped.

As for parallel fuel rails. stock GC8 rails can sometimes have fueling problems on cylinder 2 at high IDCs IIRC . Its easy to modify them to parallel setup.
__________________
RS Liberty - Because WRX's are only good for parts...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 19-07-2007, 04:32 PM
WRXTASY's Avatar
Subaru Tech Division
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In the Clouds
Posts: 1,159
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
WRXTASY at standard level
Default

Cheers All

Joe: Thats the formula I was looking for Guiseppe thanks.

Stace: FPR...Parallels....Sigh... Hot 4's alright. I thought this was discussed ad infinitum in your FPR thread!!!

Foxey: Yes VF36, Built EJ207 + JDM worked heads with Spec C cams.


Just to clarify at moment I have MY99 Manifold +560cc STi side feeds, but can get 02 STi manifold with 816cc decaps.
If current 560cc system is enough then I will stick with that.

Is there any improvement with the MY02 STi manifold over the MY99 one ?

Not chasing big big KW but want to talk the Torque.

J
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 19-07-2007, 04:34 PM
WRXTASY's Avatar
Subaru Tech Division
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In the Clouds
Posts: 1,159
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
WRXTASY at standard level
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister Two
As for parallel fuel rails. stock GC8 rails can sometimes have fueling problems on cylinder 2 at high IDCs IIRC . Its easy to modify them to parallel setup.
MOTEC M800 = Individual cylinder trim on #2
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 19-07-2007, 04:53 PM
tuna's Avatar
Sign me up!
Why stop at two bar?
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Where horsepower is cool again.
Posts: 5,570
Blog Entries: 5
Thanks: 7
Thanked 107 Times in 50 Posts
tuna is a gurutuna is a guru
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister Two
According to his profile... Hes got a 99 WRX right? Which means. You cannot de-cap the injectors. 99 WRX has side feed injectors. And while they can be high flowed, they cannot be decapped..
true, although i though he had a modern manifold.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister Two
As for parallel fuel rails. stock GC8 rails can sometimes have fueling problems on cylinder 2 at high IDCs IIRC . Its easy to modify them to parallel setup.
not the case, this is due to the vacuum line on the fuel pressure regulator. move the vacuum line to the centre of the manifold and the FPR will have a correct pressure feed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WRXTASY
MOTEC M800 = Individual cylinder trim on #2
unless your logging cylinder EGT, i would suggest not doing this

Quote:
Originally Posted by WRXTASY
Just to clarify at moment I have MY99 Manifold +560cc STi side feeds, but can get 02 STi manifold with 816cc decaps.
If current 560cc system is enough then I will stick with that.

Is there any improvement with the MY02 STi manifold over the MY99 one ?

Not chasing big big KW but want to talk the Torque.
i found 550's maxed out around 220kw with safety margins, (wideband lambda closed loop)

you'll want 816's for the boost, big torque needs it. at around 350hp i still only acheived around 65% duty.

the GD style manifold is better flowing then the GC manifold, i'll have definitative figures for it soon (if your really interested)
__________________

Long live the WRC

Last edited by tuna; 19-07-2007 at 04:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 19-07-2007, 05:05 PM
Subaru Tech Division
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Centrelink for my diss pension
Posts: 1,518
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
POLARBEAR666 at standard level
Default

I have 700 cc side feeds with standard rails just bigger custom fuel lines with parallel setup to the Sard FPR. The sard lets u squeeze a bit more pressure out of the system if your injectors get marginal at higher hp levels.
__________________
[url]http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/6284/evobeatsstiug6.gif[/url]
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 19-07-2007, 05:09 PM
WRXTASY's Avatar
Subaru Tech Division
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In the Clouds
Posts: 1,159
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
WRXTASY at standard level
Default

Thanks Stace.....

Just plugged some figures into Guiseppe's calculator...

320bhp (240 KW) at 90% IDC = 560 cc/min, and that would only be at the crank.....

400bhp (300 KW) at the crank is about 240 KW at the wheels so yes its a GD manifold with the 816cc decaps.

Good discussion....
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 19-07-2007, 09:39 PM
tuna's Avatar
Sign me up!
Why stop at two bar?
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Where horsepower is cool again.
Posts: 5,570
Blog Entries: 5
Thanks: 7
Thanked 107 Times in 50 Posts
tuna is a gurutuna is a guru
Default

i tend to run IDC's up to 95%, beyond that i let wideband make the corrections for lean/rich to smooth it out.

im unsure what plans you have for your setup, but i assume you dont want to be doing it twice, pm me if need be.

cheers!
__________________

Long live the WRC
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 19-07-2007, 10:15 PM
Subaru Tech Division
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Centrelink for my diss pension
Posts: 1,518
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
POLARBEAR666 at standard level
Default

IDC's on my 440's were at 99% for ages without an explosion.
__________________
[url]http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/6284/evobeatsstiug6.gif[/url]
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 19-07-2007, 10:20 PM
mr_psi's Avatar
Flat Four Father
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hillarys
Posts: 2,126
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
mr_psi at standard level
Send a message via MSN to mr_psi
Default

18 litres per minute.... you cant tip it down the drain that fasT!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
<>, injectors, kw, size


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




Welcome to Perth-WRX, click here to register!

All times are GMT +8. The time now is 01:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO